As I wrote in Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 3277 at para. 48: Extrapolating from the B.(K.) case, it appears that the greater the concerns raised regarding a child's physical or emotional welfare in a stay application, the more that the issue of irreparable harm is subsumed into a best interests analysis. In that event, the moving party need only show "a reasonably perceivable risk that the child will suffer harm if the stay is not granted”.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.