The fourth and final requirement is that the misrepresentation materially induced the plaintiff to act in a manner that results in damage. The test of materiality is objective: would the statement have induced a reasonable person to act in reliance on it? If so it must then be determined whether the plaintiff actually relied on it. Perell, quotes Hinchey v. Gonda, [1955] O.W.N. 125 (H.C.) for the proposition that the test of determining materiality is whether the plaintiff’s conduct might have been different had the representation not been made.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.