It is well established that, to succeed on a motion for an extension of time, an applicant has to meet the fourfold test set out in Belmonte v. CUPE, [2004] F.C.J. No. 634: The tests which a party claiming an extension of time must meet have been set out in Canada (Attorney General) v. Hennelly, 1999 CanLII 8190 (FCA), [1999] F.C.J. No. 846 at paragraph 3: 1. a continuing intention to pursue his or her application; 2. that the application has some merit; 3. that no prejudice to the respondent arises from the delay; and 4. that a reasonable explanation for the delay exists.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.