What is the test for the admissibility of new evidence at trial?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Pierce, 2011 BCCA 485 (CanLII):

The four-part test from Palmer v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759 on the admissibility of fresh evidence is well known: the proposed evidence could not have been adduced at trial by due diligence, it is relevant to a decisive or potentially decisive issue at trial, it is credible, and, if believed, it could be expected to have affected the trial.

Other Questions


Can an appellate court "reconsider" evidence presented at trial when there is a reasoned belief that the trial judge must have forgotten or misconceived the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge's failure to give reasons sufficient to determine that the trial judge erred in appreciation of a relevant issue or application of the evidence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for admissibility of expert evidence at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test on an application to adduce fresh evidence that existed at the time of trial but was not placed before the trial court? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is a fresh evidence when a father applies to admit evidence that he did not have at the time of trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a summary trial judge make a finding that a matter is not suitable for disposition by way of summary trial during the hearing of the summary trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge bound by the strict rules regarding the admissibility of fresh evidence in an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a trial judge bound to comment upon all the evidence at trial to support an expert testimony? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between "new evidence" and “new evidence” at trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
What summary of evidence is admissible as evidence in an extradition hearing? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.