What is the case authorities in the context of a medical malpractice case?

I don't propose to review the case authorities in any detail at all. One quotation that I will not even read in but just paraphrase is from the decision of Master Chamberlist, as he then was in Mahoney v. Mahoney, [1997] B.C.J. No.1448, and basically what Master Chamberlist there said is that the format of an examination chosen by the applicant, that is the defendant here, should prevail in the absence of compelling reasons to the contrary. So here, unless there are compelling reasons to the contrary, there should be no taping, that being the format that the defendants and their doctor prefer.