Hood J. grappled with this argument in Bellinger v. Nuytten Estate and found (at para. 39) that no trust was intended in the context of a grant of the residue of the estate to the surviving spouse for her own use absolutely, but it was decided as a factual matter rather than as a legal inevitability. Hood J. considered the various arguments canvassed in Birmingham, and ways in which a “floating trust” could be suspended and held in abeyance during the life of the survivor so as to allow for a grant of the residue for the survivor’s use absolutely that still had attached to it a binding commitment to leave whatever was left to the agreed upon ultimate beneficiaries.[29]
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.