What is the test for standing at the first-stage hearing of a named person’s claim to be a confidential informant?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Podolski, 2015 BCCA 513 (CanLII):

It would have been an error to have afforded standing to the appellants at the first-stage hearing. As a general rule, an accused has no standing to assert or oppose the recognition of a third party’s status as a confidential informant. In Named Person v. Vancouver Sun, Bastarache J., writing for the majority, held:

While the judge is determining whether the privilege applies, all caution must be taken on the assumption that it does apply. This means that under no circumstances should any third party be admitted to the proceedings, and even the claim of informer privilege must not be disclosed. The only parties admitted in this part of the proceeding are the person who seeks the protection of the privilege and the Attorney General. It is the responsibility of the judge at this stage to demand from the parties some evidence which satisfies the judge, on balance, that the person is a confidential informer. Once it has been established on the evidence that the person is a confidential informer, the privilege applies. I cannot overemphasize the importance of this last point. The judge has no discretion not to apply the privilege: Bisaillon v. Keable [1983 CanLII 26 (SCC), [1983] 2 S.C.R. 60], at p. 93. If the person is an informer, the privilege applies fully. …

Other Questions


Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a personal representative of the deceased's estate make a claim under s. 151(3) of the BC Supreme Court of Justice for personal representative leave to continue to pursue his claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear personal injury claims in personal injury cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law allow a party to claim that information is confidential where the information is already known to the public? (British Columbia, Canada)
What defines an informed person and what defines that informed person? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate format of a hearing at the BC SPCA for a personal injury claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the proper format of a hearing at the BC SPCA for a personal injury claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law or case law that supports the claim that there are trade secrets or confidential information? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the process for hearing a personal injury claim at the BC SPCA? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a person acts within their legal rights, is that person liable even if another person suffers a loss? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.