What is the burden of meeting the first segment of the two-part test for freedom of religion?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Baars v. Children’s Aid Society of Hamilton, 2018 ONSC 1487 (CanLII):

In any event, I am not persuaded that the applicants have met their burden with respect to the first segment of two-part test as outlined in Withler v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 12 (CanLII). While the applicants have established the effect of breach of their rights related to freedom of religion, in my view, they have not demonstrated a distinction based on an enumerated class of persons or analogous grounds to sustain their argument.

Other Questions


Is freedom of conscience greater than freedom of religion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving that a doctor failed to meet the standard of care? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for freedom of religion? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between the burden of proof and the evidential burden? (Ontario, Canada)
Does having the father present his case first, including evidence presented by the father and his witnesses, result in the mother’s counsel eliciting information from the mother without first putting the issue to the father? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of persuasion required for an appellant to persuade a court that her Charter rights or freedoms have been denied or denied? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for interlocutory relief in the context of religious freedom and religious freedom? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of informed consent placed on the patient when advised to undergo the first angiogram? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a defendant’s predominant motivation (i.e. religion or expression) to exercise s. 2(b) freedom of expression? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a material change in circumstances? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.