What is the implied undertaking as a legal obligation to the court?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Alberta Treasury Branches v. Leahy, 2000 ABQB 575 (CanLII):
The case authority referred to me as the first formulation of the implied undertaking as a legal obligation to the court is Alterskye v. Scott, [1948] 1 All E.R. 469 (Ch.D.) In that case, the defendant had refused to provide a further and better affidavit of production unless he obtained an undertaking by the plaintiff not to use the documents disclosed for any ulterior or collateral purpose.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the implied undertaking of an implied undertaking apply to the use of a searchable searchable database? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will the Court allow the Court to amend the Rules of Civil Procedure to allow the Courts to use the functional approach? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the implied undertaking in questioning in other child welfare cases? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court order all court-ordered sales of a personal injury property be exempt from all court ordered sales? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have any authority to transfer proceedings under R.12 from the Court of Appeal to the Superior Court? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the Court have a duty or obligation to review the evidence at trial to determine guilt or innocence? (Alberta, Canada)
In an application for a writ of habeas corpus, is the court bound by virtue of the fact that the court has granted custody of a child in a custody dispute? (Alberta, Canada)
How has the court considered the specific circumstance of a payor spouse’s obligation to pay child support to a second family? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the Charter and the role of the courts? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a court impute income under section 19(1)(a) of the Child Support Guidelines where the payor has pursued a deliberate course of conduct for the purpose of evading child support obligations? (Alberta, Canada)
