What is the implied undertaking as a legal obligation to the court?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Alberta Treasury Branches v. Leahy, 2000 ABQB 575 (CanLII):

The case authority referred to me as the first formulation of the implied undertaking as a legal obligation to the court is Alterskye v. Scott, [1948] 1 All E.R. 469 (Ch.D.) In that case, the defendant had refused to provide a further and better affidavit of production unless he obtained an undertaking by the plaintiff not to use the documents disclosed for any ulterior or collateral purpose.

Other Questions


Does a party have to sign an implied undertaking of confidentiality to the court not to use the documents or information provided on discovery for purposes of litigation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of the implied undertaking in the context of an implied undertaking? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the implied undertaking of an implied undertaking apply to the use of a searchable searchable database? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a court have an obligation to reduce a payor’s support obligation when he is sentenced to 22 months in jail? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there an obligation of counsel for an applicant for an ex parte order, as an officer of the court, to disclose any facts which might have influenced the court's decision? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a court refuse to enforce an undertaking in a cause where the undertaking was given under an admitted mistake? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal authority of this court? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for the interpretation of implied contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When will the Court consider implied terms in the pleadings of an appeal? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the duty owed to the court by legal counsel a public duty? (British Columbia, Canada)