What is the burden of proving a claim of discrimination against a doctor who is not a qualified doctor?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Landau v. Granville Gardens Housing Co-operative and another, 2014 BCHRT 85 (CanLII):

Once a prima facie case has been established at a hearing, the burden shifts to the respondent to justify the conduct or practice. If it cannot be justified, discrimination will be found to have occurred: Bell v. Dr. Sherk and others, 2003 BCHRT 63 (“Bell”).

Other Questions


Is resolution of an important part of a claim against a party in a personal injury claim against the other party to the claim substantially less impact on the balance of the claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim of sexual discrimination? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving prima facie discrimination by a respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does Adorable have the burden of proving its claim against Twin? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden on a plaintiff to prove that a doctor breached the standard of care? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a claim against the Respondent? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving discrimination against a party in a human rights complaint? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving a case of discrimination under the BC Human Rights Code? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving discrimination against a party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proving malice to defeat the defence of qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.