The law is quite clear that members of an Indian band council and an Indian chief owe a fiduciary duty to the band as a whole. The extent of that fiduciary interest was described by Skipp J. in Gilbert v. Abbey, 1992 CanLII 921 (BC SC), [1992] 4 C.N.L.R. 21 (B.C.S.C.) at page 23: There can be no question that a duly-elected chief as well as the members of a band council are fiduciaries as far as all other members of the band are concerned. The chief upon being elected, undertakes to act in the interest of the members of the band. The members of the band are vulnerable to abuse by the fiduciary of his or her position, and a fiduciary undertakes not to allow his or her interest to conflict with the duty that he or she has undertaken.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.