As to the first alleged error, the father notes that Gordon v. Goetz directs that the judge should consider the parent’s reason for moving only in the exceptional case where it is relevant to that parent’s ability to meet the needs of the child. At para. 61, the trial judge wrote: The reasons for the move are only relevant insofar as they have a direct bearing on the best interests of the children. In the circumstances of this case, I believe the reasons for the move do have a direct bearing on the children’s best interests, both emotionally and financially.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.