Second, the judge found the father’s financial disclosure in support of his application inadequate and unreliable. On appeal, the father applied to adduce fresh evidence, presumably to shore up the basis for his submissions before Fitch J. However, having reviewed that material, I am unable to find that it meets the test for the receipt of such evidence as set out in Palmer v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC),  1 S.C.R. 759 at 775-76. It is therefore inadmissible.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.