Is a settlement agreement concluded by counsel to settle outstanding claims or issues in pending litigation enforceable?

Ontario, Canada

The following excerpt is from Lavoie v. Chambers, 2009 CanLII 18285 (ON SC):

The case of Geropoulos v. Geropoulos [1982] O.J. No. 3179 instructs that settlement agreements concluded by counsel, resolving outstanding claims or issues in pending litigation are beyond the reason and purview of Section 55 of the Family Law Act. Compliance with the requirements of that section is not a prerequisite to validity or enforceability.

Other Questions

Does a binding settlement agreement between counsel and plaintiff need to be enforceable? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the phrase “without prejudice” in a letter by counsel that proposes settlement, without more than more, constitute an offer to settle? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an enforceable settlement agreed to by the parties through their counsel? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a report commissioned by legal counsel after issues of coverage had been determined be protected by litigation privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of an agreement between the parties to settle the litigation prior to trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an agreement to settle the litigation a contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the consequences of a delay in reaching an enforceable settlement agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the impact of a written agreement that resolved all outstanding issues under the Legal Profession Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of Class Counsel’s approach to justifying the proposed settlement agreement? (Ontario, Canada)
Can a husband who agreed to a settlement with his wife in order to avoid income tax problems after the fact discover that the agreement does not protect him against income tax issues? (Ontario, Canada)