Is economic duress sufficient to vitiate consent to a family agreement?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Young v Sherk, 2019 BCSC 312 (CanLII):

Although economic duress may warrant the setting aside of a family agreement, the claim requires urgent and compelling economic pressures to vitiate consent. Merely caving to the other spouse’s insistence of entitlement and wanting to have the spouse out of one’s home is not sufficient: Stein v. Schommer, 2006 BCSC 1551 at paras. 15-21.

Other Questions


What is the test for establishing a collateral agreement where the collateral agreement is inconsistent with or contradicts the written agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the economic value of cleaning and other services provided by family members to a family business? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the economic value of providing services provided by a member of one family to the other family? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party alleging duress to prove they entered a marriage agreement because of duress? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a party seeking to change the date on which to value family property or family debt under the Family Law Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has consent been vitiated in medical malpractice cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the onus on a party seeking to set aside an agreement that was entered into the agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for self-sufficiency as a result of a separation agreement? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the difference between an agreement to agree and an expression by the parties that a completed agreement is to be memorialized? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the testator's family maintenance under the Testator's Family Maintenance Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.