The facts here can arguably be distinguished from the cases discussed in Devji v. Burnaby (District), supra, which included reactions of family members to the death of a loved one, or reactions of persons who were not present at a sporting event where a tragedy took place. The principles of reasonable forseeability and proximity may well be satisfied by the Claimants in this case because they were residents of a building in which a catastrophic event took place, the aftermath of which they allege had a direct and troubling impact on them.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.