Does the expressio unius maxim apply as a guide to interpreting s. 20 of the Local Improvements Act?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from LeBlanc Estate v. Bank of Montreal, 1988 CanLII 5261 (SK CA):

In C.P. Limited v. Carlyle (Town), 1987 CanLII 4922 (SK CA), [1987] 4 W.W.R. 232; 56 Sask. R. 91, this court applied the expressio unius maxim as a guide to interpreting s. 20 of the Local Improvements Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. L-33. Bayda, C.J.S., dissented, and cautioned against using that principle as a determinative rule when the words of a statute are otherwise clear. While I am in complete agreement with the cautionary approach of the Chief Justice, the maxim is properly used as an interpretive aid in this case.

Other Questions


Does the maxim “There’s no such thing as a good cause of fire” apply? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What are the principles to be applied in interpreting a will? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have words like “my surviving children” been interpreted in a will and how have they been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the effect of local improvement taxes on real property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the legal test for interpretation of a contract? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the role of grandparents in the development of a child and applying the best interests tests for both custody and access? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does the rule in Rylands v Fletcher apply? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the appeal from an order made by the Local Master at Moose Jaw on an application for security for costs? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the patent unreasonableness standard in the interpretation of a collective agreement? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.