What is the test for reasonable grounds in the context of privacy protection cases?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from R. v. Liu, 2011 BCSC 1266 (CanLII):
The existence of reasonable grounds is critical to the balancing of the values of privacy and crime detection. As stated in Hunter v. Southam, at p. 167: The state’s interest in detecting and preventing crime begins to prevail over the individual’s interest in being left alone at the point where credibly-based probability replaces suspicion.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for reasonable grounds in the context of privacy and crime prevention cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for reasonable grounds in the context of privacy legislation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are some cases where a court has found that a P2P user has a reasonable expectation of privacy for those files that he was sharing on a private network? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there a reasonable expectation of privacy in the context of a search and frisk in a prison cell? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law where there was no evidence which proved the case beyond a reasonable doubt? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is there any case law in which the Court of Appeal has found that there is no case law to be relied upon in the context of the doctrine of common law? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required to establish reasonable grounds in civil cases? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the reasons given in reasons delivered in a civil case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is reasonable and probable grounds for belief in the context of an allegation of sexual assault against an accused? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a Workers’s Compensation Appeal Tribunal case, is there any case law that supports the argument that there is no case law in favour of a claim under the Employment Benefits Act? (British Columbia, Canada)
