What is the difference between the earnings approach and the capital asset approach?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Evans v Keill, 2018 BCSC 1651 (CanLII):

The defining distinction between the earnings approach and the capital asset approach is the extent to which the loss is measureable. If there is little or no evidence of what the plaintiff’s post-accident earnings will be, the earnings approach may not be appropriate. Although the earnings approach is more mathematical, both approaches are a matter of judgment, not “mere calculation”: Hosseinzadeh v. Leung, 2014 BCSC 2260 at para. 126.

Other Questions


What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has a capital asset under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate capital asset approach to assessing damages for loss of capital assets? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for a claim for future income loss under an earnings approach or capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing loss of capital asset under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the appropriate approach for assessing capital assets rather than earnings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the impact of the use of a capital asset approach in determining earnings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for assessing loss of earning capacity under the capital asset approach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the current state of the law on loss of earning capacity when assessing capital asset versus earnings? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the capital asset approach to the loss of future earning capacity for a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the "capital asset" approach to determining whether a plaintiff has been rendered less capable of earning income from all types of employment? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.