Is there a duty of fairness in the making of the decision to ban smoking at Oak Ridge?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Vaughn v. Ontario, 2003 CanLII 42347 (ON SC):

In the event that the appellant was owed a duty of fairness in the making of the decision to ban smoking at Oak Ridge, I believe this duty was satisfied. As L’Heureux-Dubé wrote in Knight v. Indian Head School Division No. 19 1990 CanLII 138 (SCC), [1990] 1 S.C.R. 653, at p. 682, "the concept of procedural fairness is eminently variable and its content is to be decided in the specific context of each case". Given the nature of the decision to prohibit smoking, I believe that the appellant had sufficient opportunity to be heard.

Other Questions


Can a Minister make a decision that is a purely ministerial decision consistent with minimal procedural fairness? (Ontario, Canada)
If the father is dilatory and dilatory in making decisions about vaccines, what is the impact of the father's health decision-making? (Ontario, Canada)
What is a reasonable decision for a tribunal to make a decision on a motion for sexual assault? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a duty of procedural fairness on every public authority making an administrative decision which is not of a legislative nature? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a decision under judicial review need to relate to a specific power or right to make the very decision in issue? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a judge to make a custody and access decision? (Ontario, Canada)
Does the court have any authority or authority to make health decisions about future vaccines? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for understanding information relevant to making a decision in a litigation? (Ontario, Canada)
Is there a requirement that an Employment Standards Officer engaged in her investigative and decision-making duties conduct a formal hearing? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for splitting decision-making responsibility between two parents? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.