As was pointed out in both Niitamo and Anderson v. Kozniuk, the content of the duty of care owed by a defendant motorist will vary according to the extent to which there are circumstances that would put a reasonable driver on notice of potential hazards. There were several circumstances that would have been apparent to a reasonable driver in the defendant’s position, which would have put such a driver on notice of the prospect of potential hazards, and specifically pedestrians.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.