It is not enough to satisfy the “as a member of the family” element: - that the head of the residence in question feels some responsibility for the welfare of the driver, - that the driver lived in the owner’s residence without paying room and board, or - that the driver was welcome to come to the owner’s residence whenever he wanted to. It is not necessary in order to satisfy the “as a member of the family” element that the owner stand in loco parentis to the driver. Paynter v. Wood [1970] B.C.J. No. 333 (B.C.S.C.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.