The doctrine of mootness is engaged in cases where intervening events lead to the conclusion that a court’s decision will no longer have the effect of resolving a controversy that affects, or may affect, the rights of the parties. If a decision will have no practical effect on such rights, courts may decline to decide the case on the basis that it is moot: Borowski v. Canada (Attorney General), 1989 CanLII 123 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 342, 57 D.L.R. (4th) 231 at para. 15.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.