What is implied grant and what is implied easement?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Roop v. Hofmeyr, 2016 BCCA 310 (CanLII):

This appeal raises issues concerning the application of the doctrine of implied grant or alternatively the doctrine of implied easement of apparent accommodation or convenience, both of which are also known as the rule in Wheeldon v. Burrows (1879), 12 Ch. D. 31 (Eng. C.A.). These historic common law doctrines are a corollary to the overarching doctrine of non-derogation from grant, which provides that “the previous owner is prevented from asserting any interest or rights in the land transferred to the new owner beyond what the previous owner expressly reserves in the terms of the transfer.” See British Columbia Law Institute in its “Report on The Doctrine of Implied Grant: the rule in Wheeldon v. Burrows, Report No. 65 (Vancouver: B.C.L.I., 2012) [the “BCLI Report”] at ix. While “convoluted and obscure”, they continue to be relevant to certain modern day real property dispositions.

Other Questions


What is the legal test for establishing an easement by way of implied grant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a grant of an easement prima facie also grant such ancillary rights as necessary to its exercise or enjoyment? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an implied easement an implied right over a parcel of land? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the implications of a grant or a grant? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the different types of implied easements? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is overtime entitlement implied as an implied term on a contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an easement granted to "grantees, their heirs and assigns and their servants, customers and workmen" limited to the licensees of the grantees? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing an implied easement and the terms to attach? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of the implied undertaking in the context of an implied undertaking? (British Columbia, Canada)
When a grant is valid but not specific about what may be constructed, even if the grant does not specify what can be built on the land, does the grantee have to be an excessive user? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.