Does the doctrine of contributory negligence preclude damages in tort?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Belton v. Spencer, 2021 ONSC 2029 (CanLII):

Generally, the doctrine does not preclude an award of damages in tort because such awards tend to compensate the plaintiff rather than amount to a profit. All claims for compensation damages by the plaintiff injured by the defendant can be reduced to the extent of his own contributory negligence but cannot be wholly denied by reason of his disreputable or criminal conduct. Hall v. Hebert, at pp. 169, 180 and 186; British Columbia v. Zastowny, 2008 SCC 4 at p. 37.

Other Questions


Is there any case law that allows a plaintiff to plead both an intentional tort of negligence and an unintentional tort of intentional negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between damages in tort and damages in contract? (Ontario, Canada)
How does the "crumbling skull" doctrine affect the award of damages for negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
Is contributory negligence not a factor in determining whether the city owes the Biskey damages? (Ontario, Canada)
Is a pleading of negligent misrepresentation in a claim for damages arising in negligence simpliciter? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the duty of a plaintiff to mitigate the damages of a defendant in a tort action? (Ontario, Canada)
What are the general damages awarded for intentional torts resulting in injury to reputation, self-esteem and feelings? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for determining damages in tort that eliminates the risk of double recovery? (Ontario, Canada)
When dealing with punitive damages, when dealing with compensatory damages, does the court have a much greater scope and scope on appeal? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a charge of dangerous driving under s. 249 of the Criminal Code constitute a gross negligence of gross negligence? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.