What is the cost of retaining an expert who was not called at trial?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Paniccia Estate v. Toal, 2012 ABQB 367 (CanLII):

The issue of the disbursement cost of an expert not called at trial was recently discussed by Thomas J. in Forsberg v. Naidoo, 2011 ABQB 705 at paras. 19-23. At para. 22 he identified three steps to evaluate an expert who was retained but did not testify: ... I would not have allowed it without a more detailed explanation of why this expert did not give evidence at trial, specifically: 1. the anticipated relevant area of expertise, 2. how that expertise was expected to be relevant for this case, and 3. why that expertise did not prove relevant at trial.

Other Questions


If plaintiff had retained the home and at the trial date could she say she intended to occupy or retain the home, and if so, would the cost of the home be taken into consideration for damages? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a summary trial be held without a trial judge? (Alberta, Canada)
What are some cases where reconstruction and bio-mechanical engineering have been called to a jury trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What constitutes “non-expert opinion evidence” in identification evidence at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there any case law where a trial judge made a finding of fact based on a synthesis of ordinary and expert evidence? (Alberta, Canada)
How have competing experts been treated in the context of a jury trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a "battle of the experts" between the experts"? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of a spouse’s argument that the value of their property is to be divided according to the value it retains at the time of trial? (Alberta, Canada)
How have courts considered the need for up to 26 expert witnesses at trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of pre-trial publicity on the right to a fair trial? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.