How have courts treated the distinction between executory and executed contracts?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Chambers v. Pennyfarthing Dev. Corp., 1985 CanLII 498 (BC CA):
We were also referred to Redican v. Nesbitt, 1923 CanLII 10 (SCC), [1924] S.C.R. 135, [1924] 1 W.W.R. 305, [1924] 1 D.L.R. 536, where the distinction between executory and executed contracts was discussed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a court order rescission of a contract where the contract for sale of land has been executed? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is an employment contract valid when the substratum of the employment contract has been eroded so that the contract does not need to be substantially eroded? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts treated the issue of forbearance in the context of employment contracts? (British Columbia, Canada)
If a "social agreement" arising from an earlier decision of a municipal council is treated as a binding contract, is it binding contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for damages for breach of a contract where the contract price of a parcel of land was significantly lower than the value of the land at the time the contract was signed? (British Columbia, Canada)
How has the Court in England and Wales treated the Court of Appeal's decision to award the Commissioner's Award for Disgraceable Dismissal/Disparability? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have courts treated common law damages for breach of contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a contract is enforceable in circumstances where the contract states that a particular law will govern the contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the meaning of a contract when a contract is not enforceable? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of B.C holding that the Court has jurisdiction to determine whether a person who is not a party to a particular type of tortfeasor has a valid claim? (British Columbia, Canada)
