I am satisfied that there is no need to define the word "terrorism". When one sees a "terrorist act" one is able to define the word. When one sees a bomb placed in a public market frequented by civilians and the bomb causes death and injury, one is able to see a "terrorist act" or what is referred to as "terrorism". The word need not be defined. In the case of McAllister v. Canada (1996) 1996 CanLII 4030 (FC), 108 F.T.R. 1 at 12, Mr. Justice McKay states:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.