What is what is required to prove recklessness?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from R. v. Brain, 2003 BCCA 70 (CanLII):

What is required to prove recklessness was described Mr. Justice McIntyre in Sansregret v. Queen (1985), 1985 CanLII 79 (SCC), 18 C.C.C. (3d) 223 at 233 (S.C.C.): ... In accordance with well-established principles for the determination of criminal liability, recklessness, to form a part of the criminal mens rea, must have an element of the subjective. It is found in the attitude of one who, aware that there is danger that his conduct could bring about the result prohibited by the criminal law, nevertheless persists, despite the risk. It is, in other words, the conduct of one who sees the risk and who takes the chance. It is in this sense that the term "recklessness" is used in the criminal law and it is clearly distinct from the concept of civil negligence.

Other Questions


Is Sarbjit required to prove that re-apportionment is required as a matter of fairness? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a change in circumstances under s. 9 of the Federal Child Support Guidelines require the applicant to prove that their financial situation has improved since the date of a previous order? (British Columbia, Canada)
What evidence is required to prove the purpose of the legislation is to infringe aboriginal rights? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove that a hypothetical event occurred at the same time as an actual event? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove they have been diagnosed with motor neurone disease? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for renouncing the evidence required to prove the purpose of the contract? (British Columbia, Canada)
How much evidence will be required by a plaintiff to prove their case on the issue of causation? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test required to prove a defence of justification in a defamation case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff required to prove negative contingencies on a real and substantial possibility of occurrence? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of proof required for a plaintiff to prove hypothetical events? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.