Does a defendant have to suffer for his generosity if he accepts that which he was not at liberty to refuse?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from McKissick v. Hall, 1928 CanLII 189 (SK CA):

The defendant had no opportunity to refuse the payment of the freight, nor the feeding of the cattle, on the part of the plaintiffs, and the mere fact that he accepted that which he was not at liberty to refuse, is not evidence of his adoption or ratification of the payment. In the words of Brett, M.R., in Leigh v. Dickeson (1885) 15 Q.B.D. 607, 54 L.J.Q.B. 18: One who has made such a voluntary payment must suffer for his generosity.

Other Questions


Is a plaintiff justified in refusing to accept payment from defendant Sophie Brounstein? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any case law in which a defendant is held to have accepted a contract for the sale of a box of apples? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is a counter offer accepted as an acceptance of an offer? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for a defendant to successfully defend a claim for trespass on another person's land? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant’s negligence caused a plaintiff to suffer loss of consciousness? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Can a defendant cross-examine his co-defendant’s evidence? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does an employee's attitude and refusal to accept the authority of his superiors constitute just cause for dismissal? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a bank and its solicitor agree to accept and accept an offer of credit? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a debtor have to make a choice over whether to accept or accept a debtor's debt? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Does a defendant have to defend their claim against a plaintiff? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.