The plaintiff counters that this issue should be left to be decided by the trial judge at the conclusion of the trial, because that judge would be best positioned to assess the actual quantum of costs thrown away as a consequence of this adjournment. There is merit in that position, and I considered this an available option. But in this case, I am satisfied as to the defendant’s costs of preparing for this aborted trial, and I consider, as did my colleague, Ritter, J. in Goddard v. Day, supra, that two-thirds of the work would have to be repeated to prepare for the actual trial. The defendant will have to pay the fees incurred to date prior to the trial, and I therefore consider it appropriate to adjudicate this matter now.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.