The respondent contends that the standard to be applied when the defence seeks leave to re-open its case post-verdict is, as it should be, a rigorous test not easily met. The appellant must meet the requirements for the admission of fresh evidence on appeal set out in Palmer v. The Queen, 1979 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1980] 1 S.C.R 759. And, further, the judge must consider whether the application to re-open is in reality an attempt to reverse a tactical decision made at trial.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.