Does the defence of qualified privilege apply?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Newman et al v. Halstead et al, 2006 BCSC 65 (CanLII):

The defence of qualified privilege protects defamatory errors of fact which are not excused under the defences of justification or fair comment. Qualified privilege applies to an occasion where the defendant has an interest or duty (legal, social, or moral) to communicate the defamatory expression and its recipients have a corresponding duty or interest to receive that communication: Pressler v. Lethbridge (2000), 86 B.C.L.R. (3d) 257 at 295, 2000 BCCA 639. On the facts in the case at bar, I find that the defence of qualified privilege simply does not apply.

Other Questions


Is there an implied waiver of privilege where a party waives privilege but takes a position in relation to privileged materials that is inconsistent with maintaining privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a finding of malice defeat a defence of qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the purpose of the defence of qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a defendant have exceeded the limits of the qualified privilege defence by publishing a defamatory statement? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a defence of qualified privilege be defeated by a finding of malice? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a finding of malice affect the defences of qualified privilege and fair comment? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for the defence of qualified privilege against defamatory statements? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the defence of qualified privilege against defamatory statements? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the scope of response permitted under the defence of qualified privilege? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the defence of qualified privilege be defeated? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.