There are two branches to the defence of laches, either of which will suffice to bar a claim: a) delay in instituting or prosecuting the claim which amounts to acquiescence to the defendant’s conduct; or b) delay in instituting or prosecuting the claim which caused the defendant to alter its position in reasonable reliance on the plaintiff’s acceptance of the status quo, or otherwise permitted a situation to arise which makes it unjust to disturb. See: M.(K). v. M.(H.), 1992 CanLII 31 (SCC), [1992] 3 S.C.R. 6 at pages 77-78, and Williamson v. Saywell, 2006 BCSC 1307 at paras. 27-38.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.