As van Rensburg J. observed in Silver v. Imax (Leave), at para. 232, the CSA noted the concern of public issuers that the statutory remedy could promote “strike suits” – unmeritorious claims commenced for the purpose of pressuring public issuers into substantial settlements in order to avoid improbable, but potentially devastating, exposure. The CSA stated that the screening mechanism was designed "not only to minimize the prospects of an adverse court award in the absence of a meritorious claim but, more importantly, to try to ensure that unmeritorious litigation, and the time and expense it imposes on defendants, is avoided or brought to an end early in the litigation process."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.