What is the "crumbling skull" rule in medical malpractice cases?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from C. v. D., 2014 NSSM 2 (CanLII):

14 The "crumbling skull" rule was explained by Major J. in Athey v. Leonati at para [35]: The so‑called "crumbling skull" rule simply recognizes that the pre‑existing condition was inherent in the plaintiff's "original position". The defendant need not put the plaintiff in a position better than his or her original position. The defendant is liable for the injuries caused, even if they are extreme, but need not compensate the plaintiff for any debilitating effects of the pre‑existing condition which the plaintiff would have experienced anyway. The defendant is liable for the additional damage but not the pre‑existing damage: [References deleted] Likewise, if there is a measurable risk that the pre‑existing condition would have detrimentally affected the plaintiff in the future, regardless of the defendant's negligence, then this can be taken into account in reducing the overall award: [References deleted] This is consistent with the general rule that the plaintiff must be returned to the position he would have been in, with all of its attendant risks and shortcomings, and not a better position.

Other Questions


What is the standard of care required by a doctor in medical malpractice cases? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the effect of perception in the context of a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the standard for determining whether a person has been found to be acting reasonably in the context of a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
When there are contradictory evidence in a medical malpractice case, does the court have any authority or authority to interfere? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How have the courts treated expert reports in a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In a medical malpractice case, is the employer required to make all necessary provisions for occupational safety and health of employees? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the principles of hearsay and the exceptions to hearsay in medical malpractice cases? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
How has the respondent defended its position that it did not discriminate against the complainant in a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for balance of convenience in a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there a disqualifying conflict of interest in a medical malpractice case? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.