In Zaruk v. Simpson, 2003 BCSC 1748, 22 B.C.L.R. (4th) 43, Garson J. (then on the trial court) was dealing with a crumbling skull situation and noted at para. 34 the following comments of McLachlin C.J.C. in K.L.B. v. British Columbia, 2003 SCC 51, [2003] 2 S.C.R. 403 at para. 60: This [crumbling skull] rule is intended to ensure that the plaintiff is not put in a position better than that which he or she would have been in had the tort not been committed. It applies where the plaintiff has a pre-existing condition that would have caused or increased the risk of damage in any case.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.