28. The question then is what disposition should be made of the appeal. Crown counsel agreed the conviction on count 3 could not stand, but argued that a conviction should now be entered on one of the other counts for which no verdict was recorded as a consequence of the application of the Kienapple rule. The decision in Regina v. Provo, 1989 CanLII 71 (SCC), [1989] 2 S.C.R. 3, was offered in support of this submission. Alternatively, a conviction could be entered for the lesser included offence of common assault.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.