In order to overlook this error in law and dismiss the appeal under s. 613(1) (b)(iii) the appeal court must conclude that the trial judge would have reached the same result and convicted the accused if the error above described had not been made. The Crown bears the onus of demonstrating that the verdict would necessarily have been the same if the error had not occurred. See Colpitts v. The Queen, 1965 CanLII 2 (SCC),  1 C.C.C. 146.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.