In Todd v. Pegado, 2014 ONSC 2783, the comments of the court, at para. 60, are applicable to the instant case: The courts have also recognized that the test for causation is not to be applied too rigidly, nor does causation need to be established with scientific precision. It is essentially a practical question of fact which can best be answered by ordinary common sense. As well, application of these principles will involve a “robust and pragmatic approach” to assessing the evidence. However, that approach is not a substitute for evidence of causation. It does not alter the amount of proof required.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.