Can a plaintiff continue to seek the same remedy using different legal arguments in different triers of fact?

Ontario, Canada


The following excerpt is from Janet Campagiorni et al. v. Lyne Legare et al., 2020 ONSC 667 (CanLII):

The courts have made it abundantly clear that litigants may not have endless opportunities to seek the same remedy using different legal arguments in front of different triers of fact. See Alberta v. Pocklington Foods Inc., 1995 ABCA 111, at para. 8.

Other Questions


Does a cottage owner who only uses the right of way only on a few times a year, only for a seasonal basis, and only for the seasonal use of the property, have it been deemed continuous use? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the difference between a plaintiff’s in rem action for a declaration of invalidity arising from s. 52 of the Constitution Act, 1982, and a personal remedy arising from the same remedy? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the appropriate test for determining the degree of force used by the trier of fact in a civil case? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for using the word "similar fact evidence" in a motion where the evidence is not the same fact evidence? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for applying palpable and overriding error standard in appellate review of findings of fact and of mixed fact and law? (Ontario, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have a legally tenable claim against the proposed defendant? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the test for a plaintiff to be certified as a plaintiff in a medical malpractice case? (Ontario, Canada)
Can the court use the application procedure under rule 14.05(h) of the Rules of Civil Procedure to determine whether there will be any material facts in dispute? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the remedy of constructive trust available to a plaintiff in a constructive trust action? (Ontario, Canada)
What is the legal test for difference of opinion? (Ontario, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.