18 In Mahe v. Alberta (1990), 1990 CanLII 133 (SCC), 68 D.L.R. (4th) 69 (S.C.C.), Dickson C.J.C. (as he then was) expresses the confidence of the judiciary that governments will comply with declarations at p. 106: Such a declaration will ensure that the appellants' rights are realized while, at the same time, leaving the government with the flexibility necessary to fashion a response which is suited to the circumstances. As the Attorney-General for Ontario submits, the government should have the widest possible discretion in selecting the institutional means by which its s. 23 obligations are to be met; the courts should be loath to interfere and impose what will be necessarily procrustean standards, unless that discretion is not exercised at all, or is exercised in such a way as to deny a constitutional right.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.