Also, in Regina v. Morin, S.C.C., 1992 CanLII 89 (SCC), [1992], 1 S.C.R. 771 @ 774 it is stated, “Action or non-action by the accused which is inconsistent with a desire for a timely trial is something that the court must consider.” The behaviour by the defence that should be considered is delay asking for disclosure already in possession of the defence, failure to make this application prior to any trial date or on the two previous trial dates, and waiver of the delay resulting from the adjournment in May, 2005. The Law
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.