The analysis of causation is not simply a function of applying the Latin maxim “post hoc ergo propter hoc” (roughly translated as “after that therefore because of that”). The evidence of a temporal relationship, alone, is not proof of a cause-and-effect relationship. The unpersuasive nature of this kind of rationale is so well recognized that the courts developed the Latin maxim above to capture the deficiency of such reason (see White v. Stonestreet, 2006 BCSC 801).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.