The court has also frequently cautioned against attempting to read too much into isolated statements in clinical records. Such statements are only a brief summary or paraphrase of what the plaintiff said, with no record of the question being responded to or of anything else that may have been said that might in some way explain, expand upon or qualify a particular doctor’s note: Edmondson v. Payer, 2011 BCSC 118 at paras. 32 to 34, aff’d 2012 BCCA 114.
Get a full legal research memo!
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.