The following excerpt is from Rowat v. Canada (Information Commissioner), 2000 CanLII 15221 (FC):
Most recently, Hughessen J. in L"Hirondelle v. Canada, [2000] F.C.J. No. 192, had occasion to consider an application to strike out parts of an affidavit adduced for the purposes of a motion to be dealt with at a later date. He found the affidavit to be replete with legal opinion, conjecture and argument from a deponent apparently not qualified to offer such opinion but observed at page 4: thereafter at page 5, he concluded:
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexsei.com.