The court’s primary concern when considering an application to vary a marriage agreement is whether the agreement was fair when it was made: Hartshorne v. Hartshorne, 2004 SCC 22. Further, the court must presume that an equal division of the family assets is fair; equal division is the standard against which the agreement must be measured, not some other scheme of division that might also be considered to be fair: M. (S.B.) v. M. (N.), 2003 BCCA 300. Finally, the court must not proceed on the basis of rough estimates of the values of the assets involved; in order for the court to perform its function under s. 65, the party seeking to displace the agreement must show that the value of the assets was unfairly divided. This proposition was established in Hartshorne, supra, at para. 52:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.