Where there is some doubt that a court order accurately or fully embodies a judgment the court may look to the reasons, - or evidence of the grounds upon which the order was made - to ascertain its meaning (See: Canadian pacific Railway Company v. Blair (1905) 1905 CanLII 4 (SCC), 36 S.C.R. 159 at 161). Where, as here, there were no reasons as such, but the order was given on the basis of the consent of the other party, I think the terms and limits of that consent may be reviewed.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.