Further, in Roberge v. Huberman, Esson J.A. clarified at para. 58 that: What the court was called on to do by the case presented for the plaintiff was to consider and assess, with the assistance of counsel's submissions, any evidence adduced by the plaintiff which was potentially relevant to the question whether there had been a breach of duty.… That process involves the court applying its experience and knowledge in the way that judges and juries do every day, most often without expert evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.