What is the difference between tentative remarks and the law?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Clark v. Barrick, 1948 CanLII 140 (SK CA):
I find it difficult to reconcile the tentative remarks with the opinion, quoted immediately above, and it seems to me that, if the last quotation expresses the law, then the protection supposed to be afforded by a caveat becomes largely illusory. Anyhow, this dictum is merely a faint echo of what was said in Wilkie v. Jellett, supra.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is it a violation of Canadian law that a plaintiff has to travel to a different province to bring a claim at a different court? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between a mortgage and a guarantee? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for making a judgment in a different form? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for overturning a conviction of sexual assault against a man who was found guilty of the same offence by a different judge? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between questions of law and fact? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between a discharge application and the discharge application? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for jurisdiction to order a child in a different country? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between granting an exclusive right to possession and control of a gravel pit and a right of way? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the difference between the main provision of a certificate and the proviso? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
Is there any difference between s. 3 and 10 of the tortfeasors section of the s.10 of the S.16(2) of the common law common law? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
